Moral Low Ground

Our Earth

Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New ‘Highly Toxic’ Dow Pesticide Sulfoxaflor

(Photo: Natalie Sayin)

(Photo: Natalie Sayin)

Green group: ‘The EPA continues to put industry interests first to exacerbate an already dire pollinator crisis.’

Lauren McCauley, Common Dreams

Despite new findings that prove a heightened crisis in US bee populations and a recent ban in Europe on similar chemical applications, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has decided to further endanger the population Monday by approving a “highly toxic” new pesticide.

The “EPA continues to put industry interests first to exacerbate an already dire pollinator crisis,” writes the group Beyond Pesticides.

The agency granted sulfoxaflor, a product of the Dow Chemical Company, “unconditional registration” for use on vegetables, fruits, barley, canola, ornamentals, soybeans and wheat among others, despite the EPA’s own classification of the insecticide as “highly toxic to honey bees.”

According to the Washington Examiner, the EPA’s studies on the chemical’s long-term effect on bees proved to be “inconclusive due to some issues with the study designs” and thus the EPA has proposed simply reducing the amount applied.

As part of their decision, the EPA approved new language for the sulfoxaflor labels which reads, “Do not apply this product at any time between 3 days prior to bloom and until after petal fall,” during heightened pollinator activity.

Further, they approved an additional ‘advisory pollinator statement’:

Notifying known beekeepers within 1 mile of the treatment area 48 hours before the product is applied will allow them to take additional steps to protect their bees. Also limiting application to times when managed bees and native pollinators are least active, e.g., before 7 am or after 7pm local time or when temperature is below 55oF at the site of application, will minimize risk to bees.

Though the EPA believes this advisory to be “robust” enough to protect pollinators, environmental advocacy groups such as Beyond Pesticides believe such statements “not only underscore the risks to bees” but prove to be unrealistic since systemic pesticides, including sulfoxaflor, “continue to exist in the plant (including pollen and nectar) for longer periods of time that well surpasses the recommended application intervals, and therefore expose bees to residues longer than suggested.”

And, in addition to harming bees, sulfoxaflor has been known to cause tumors and carcinomas in mice and rats and has been classified as “suggestive evidence of carcinogenic potential.”

Dismissing these concerns, the EPA alternately points to the “need for sulfoxaflor by industry and agriculture groups to control insects no longer being controlled by increasingly ineffective pesticide technologies,” proving the ongoing and harmful nature of unsustainable techniques such as pesticide sprays.

Following Europe’s announcement last week that they would suspend the use of bee-harming neonicotinoids in an effort to combat the rampant colony collapse crisis, many hoped the US would announce similar reforms.

However, following this week’s announcement, groups say it is clear the EPA will continue pursue an “irresponsible” and “counter-intuitive” agenda in regards to bee health and the environment.

*****

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

3 Comments

  1. JeckieMay 12, 2013 at 5:49 amReply

    We all must realize that the EPA does not give a damn about honeybees! They visit the almond groves in California to pacify the growers and beekeepers and all they want to talk about is disease and varroa mites. They sponsor the pollinator summit and drag along representatives from Bayer, Monsanto, and Dow, and all they want to talk about is the new technology in planting equipment. The EPA is constantly telling us bee declines are caused by multiple factors this way the whole problem is turned in to a syndrome which there is no known cure, so no action is required. The EU has finally come to its senses and is placing a ban on some neonicotinoids while the corporate clowns on the other side of the Atlantic want to introduce more! If you want us to believe the multiple factor theory you better start eliminating the factors that you have created in the past 20 years.

  2. TameraMay 12, 2013 at 6:56 amReply

    The EPA has convinced all the fools that the honeybee collapse problem is very complicated and caused by multiple factors, viruses, mites, habitat, nutrition, on and on to the point where every one is convinced that this is a syndrome so there really is no cure. In the meantime they are promoting new pesticides like this new Dow neurotoxin Sulfoxaflor which the EPA has allowed for emergency use in the cotton fields down south. So the collapse of the pollinators is not an emergency but some cotton field in Louisiana is?

  3. Amanda ClarkMay 21, 2013 at 11:25 pmReply

    Pesticide resistance is caused by not using the product properly (such as rotating products with different modes of action, and using proper intervals to spray. Most likely these people DO NOT FOLLOW THE LABEL RECCOMENDATIONS in the first place. Just because they reccomend certain spray times, it does not mean they will be followed. BTW- How is the Beekeeper supposed to stop their bees from flying/eating every 3-14 days (which is the likely spray interval)?

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Douche Du Jour
  • GOP Congressman Robert Pittenger Says Charlotte Protesters ‘Hate White People Because They’re Successful’
  • Israel Nominates Col. Eyal Karim, Who Endorsed Rape of Non-Jews to ‘Boost Troop Morale,’ for Chief Military Rabbi
  • The Hateful 8: Anti-Gay Christian Leaders Praise Orlando Massacre
  • Koch Brother’s Youth Education Program Teaches ‘Sacrificing Lives for Profits’
  • Tracy Murphree, GOP Texas Sheriff Candidate, Threatens to Beat Transgender Women Unconscious
Archives