Moral Low Ground


‘On This Day’ 1999: NATO’s War Against Serbia Begins

Central Belgrade under NATO attack.

Central Belgrade under NATO attack.

This story begins, believe it or not, in the howling wilderness of Afghanistan in 1989 as the Soviet invaders withdrew in defeat. The United States abandoned its support for the mujahedeen fighters who had so bravely resisted the Soviet occupation, and the country soon descended into civil war. The official narrative says Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, Washington’s former mujahedeen allies, turned on the West after the US stationed infidel troops on Islam’s holiest ground during Operation Desert Shield in 1990. Since then, the story goes, the relationship between the United States and Islamic jihadists has been one of enmity, characterized by terror attacks and fierce American retribution. The real story is something altogether different.

The United States transported thousands of al-Qaeda and other mujahedeen, fresh off their smashing success in Afghanistan, to the Balkans to fight the Serbs as Yugoslavia disintegrated into civil war in the early 1990s. These Islamic warriors were accompanied by US Special Forces. The Clinton administration armed and trained these fighters, in direct violation of UN accords, and arms purchased by Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iran were secretly shipped to the Islamists via Croatia, which netted a hefty profit from each transaction. A Dutch intelligence report found that the United States was “very closely involved” in these weapons transfers.

Once the Bosnian war ended the US found itself faced with the problem of thousands of Islamist warriors  in Bosnia. There would, as we all now know, be severe repercussions just a few years down the road. But before 9/11 there was Kosovo.

The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) was formed in the 1990s by ethnic Albanian Kosovars from southwestern Yugoslavia. Emboldened by the success of other nationalities that were winning their independence from Belgrade as Yugoslavia crumbled, the KLA began to violently expel as many non-Albanians from Kosovo as it could. Gypsies, Jews, Turks and, above all, Serbs were all victims of KLA ethnic cleansing. The American special envoy to Bosnia called the KLA “without any question, a terrorist group” and the US State Department accordingly added the group to its list of terrorist organizations. KLA backers included Osama bin Laden and other Islamic radicals; the group funded its terror via the international heroin trade as well as by human trafficking, sex slavery and prostitution.

Despite this nastiness the KLA endeared itself to Washington by fighting against the despised and defiant Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic. By this time Yugoslavia, once composed of eight nominally autonomous republics, had been reduced to a rump of Serbia, Montenegro and Kosovo by years of bloody civil war and secession. To Serbs, the dominant ethnic group in what remained of Yugoslavia, Kosovo is regarded as the very birthplace of their nation. Belgrade wasn’t about to let Kosovo go without a fight and everyone knew it, including the Clinton administration.

Although NATO called the KLA “the main initiator of the violence” in Kosovo and top US diplomat William Walker admitted to a “deliberate campaign of [KLA] provocation,” the Clinton administration was determined to attack the Milosevic regime in Belgrade. American intelligence informed top Clinton officials that the KLA was deliberately provoking harsh retaliatory strikes by the Serbians in order to draw the United States and NATO into the conflict. But Bill Clinton wasn’t listening. NATO powers, led by the United States, issued Milosevic an ultimatum they knew he could never accept: allow NATO to occupy all of Kosovo and have free reign in Serbia as well.

Said US Assistant Secretary of State James Rubin: “Publicly we had to make clear we were seeking an agreement, but privately we knew the chances of the Serbs agreeing were quite small.” It was a real-life Wag the Dog scenario, complete with exaggerated or fabricated tales of Serb atrocities against the Albanians of Kosovo. The United States and NATO powers tried to sell the impending attack against Yugoslavia as a humanitarian intervention to stave off Serb ethnic cleansing of Albanians. But there were two big problems.

First, there was no Serb ethic cleansing of Albanian Kosovars until after NATO began mercilessly bombing Yugoslavia in late March of 1999. The German government issued several reports confirming this. This one from October 1998 reads, in part:

The violent actions of the Yugoslav military and police since February 1998 were aimed at separatist activities and are no proof of a persecution of the whole Albanian ethnic group in Kosovo or a part of it. What was involved in the Yugoslav violent actions and excesses since February 1998 was a selective forcible action against the military underground movement (especially the KLA)… A state program or persecution aimed at the whole ethnic group of Albanians exists neither now nor earlier.

While Serbs certainly did commit atrocities (especially after the ferocious NATO bombing campaign began), these were often greatly exaggerated by the Clinton administration and most of the US mainstream media. President Clinton claimed that 600,000 ethnic Albanians were “trapped within Kosovo… lacking shelter, short of food, afraid to go home or buried in mass graves dug by their executioners.” This was completely false. American diplomat David Scheffer said that “225,000 ethnic Albanian men… are missing, presumed dead.” Again, a total fabrication. The FBI, the International War Crimes Tribunal and other global forensics experts flocked to Kosovo in droves after the NATO bombs stopped falling. The total number of victims they found was around one percent of the figure claimed by the United States.

But once NATO attacked, the Serb response was predictably furious. Shockingly, NATO commander General Wesley Clark said that the ensuing Serbian atrocities against the Albanian Kosovar population had been “fully anticipated” and were of no concern to Washington. Not only did the NATO and the KLA provoke a war with Yugoslavia, they did so knowing that many innocent civilians would be killed, maimed and displaced in the certain and harsh reprisal attacks carried out by enraged Serb forces. Michael McGwire, a former top NATO planner, admitted that “to describe the [NATO] bombing as ‘humanitarian intervention [is] really grotesque.”

The other big problem with America claiming it was attacking Yugoslavia on humanitarian grounds was that Washington had recently allowed—and was currently allowing—far worse humanitarian catastrophes to unfold before the world’s very eyes without batting an eyelash. The 1994 genocide in Rwanda claimed over 800,000 lives while the Bill Clinton and the United States (along with the rest of the world) stood idly by. Clinton also had no qualms about the brutality of the Taliban regime America was backing in the name of “stability” in Afghanistan, nor did he do anything to stop the Russians from viciously crushing the nationalist uprisings in the Caucuses where Chechen rebels were fighting for their independence—much as Albanian Kosovars were fighting the Serbs.

Colombia, the number one recipient of American military and economic aid in the Western Hemisphere, was waging a fiercely brutal decades-long campaign of terror against leftist insurgents, indigenous peoples and anyone who opposed the government. Clinton’s response? Increasing American aid to Bogota year after year. In Anatolia, not only did the US do nothing to prevent Turkey from committing atrocities against Kurdish separatists, the Clinton administration positively encouraged its NATO ally with billions of dollars of loans and arms sales to Ankara. It was illegal to even utter a word in the Kurdish language in Turkey until 1991 and the ethnic identity of Kurds was not recognized, yet in 1990 the US gave the country over $400 million in grants and sold it nearly a billion dollars in weapons that Ankara would use to try and destroy any notion of Kurdish nationhood.

Much closer to the conflict at hand, the United States tacitly approved of the single largest crime of ethnic cleansing in European history since the Holocaust when up to 200,000 Serbs were expelled from the Krajina region of Croatia by that nation’s American-trained military in August 1995 in “Operation Storm.” Krajina Serbs had purged the region of its Croat minority four years earlier in their own ethnic cleansing campaign; now it was the Serbs‘ turn to be on the receiving end of the horror.

The Croatian government sought American military aid for “Operation Storm” but Deputy Defense Secretary (and soon to be CIA director) John Deutsch was prevented by an arms embargo. Deutsch suggested the Croatians look to the private sector. They hired Virginia-based Military Professional Resources, Inc, staffed full of top retired American military officers including a former Army Chief of Staff. With their unofficial American training—and Washington’s blessing, the Croatian forces stormed through Krajina, shelling towns and slaughtering innocent Serb civilians. The sick and the elderly who were unable to flee were executed or burned alive in their homes. Croatian soldiers machine-gunned convoys of fleeing refugees.

So much for President Clinton’s rationale that the US and NATO were attacking Yugoslavia out of humanitarian benefaction. Most Americans have never heard of “Operation Storm” because most of the American corporate mainstream media was focused solely on the crimes of Slobodan Milosevic and the Serbs; whether real, imagined or grossly exaggerated. Yes, Milosevic could be a cruel dictator. But his crimes were no better or worse than those committed by all sides during the hellish 1990s in fragmenting Yugoslavia. Washington’s hypocrisy in how it dealt with the complex cauldron of Balkan affairs did not help one bit.

Washington’s selective indignation at Serb “atrocities” is utterly inexcusable when held up to the horrific, seemingly indiscriminate atrocities witnessed during the NATO air assault against the people of Yugoslavia. Says noted Australian journalist John Pilger: “In the attack on Serbia, two percent of NATO’s missiles hit military targets; the rest hit hospitals, schools, factories, churches and broadcast studios.”

There is no doubt that the US was targeting the people of Serbia as much, if not more, than the military. As many civilians died in the attacks as did military and police personnel. NATO knocked out electricity in 70 percent of Yugoslavia, endangering the lives of hospital patients, at the insistence of the Americans. The alliance also disrupted Serbs’ water supplies.

NATO warplanes also deliberately bombed the headquarters of Serbian state television and radio in the middle of heavily populated downtown Belgrade. The attack occurred without warning while 200 staff were working in the building; the dead included a make-up artist, a cameraman, a program director, an editor, three security guards and many others. There is no doubt that this attack was meant to demoralize the people of Serbia. There is also no doubt that those who ordered the bombing knew exactly what outcome to expect: a NATO planning document seen by Bill Clinton, Tony Blair and Jacques Chirac forecast up to 350 deaths in the event of such an attack, with as many as 250 of the victims projected to be innocent civilians living in nearby apartments.

NATO wanted to fight a “zero casualty war.” For themselves, that is, not for the people of Yugoslavia. “This will be painful for the Serbs,” Pentagon spokesman Kenneth Bacon sadistically predicted. And it was. NATO warplanes flew missions at 15,000 feet, a safe height for the pilots. But this increased civilian casualties on the ground. An attack on central Belgrade mistakenly hit Dragisa Misovic hospital with a laser-guided bomb, destroying a children’s ward and wounding several women who had the unfortunate luck of being in labor at the precise moment of attack. Dragana Kristic, age 23, was recovering from cancer surgery—she just had a ten-pound tumor removed from her stomach—when the bombs blew shards of glass into her neck. “I don’t know which hurts more,” she lamented, “my stomach, my shoulder or my heart.” Victims of NATO’s ferocious onslaught lay dead and dying in the hospital around her.

That wasn’t the only hospital NATO bombed. Cluster bombs struck a hospital and a market in the city of Nis, killing 15 and wounding 60. An emergency center and a medical dispensary were hit in the mining town of Aleksinac resulting in at least five deaths and dozens of injuries.

Targeting civilian rail lines with deadly results at Grdelica Gorge.

Bridges were a favorite target of NATO bombardment. An international passenger train traveling from Belgrade to Thessaloniki, Greece was blown apart by two missiles as it crossed a bridge over Grdelica Gorge. The dead included children and a pregnant woman. At least 23 civilians were killed when a bus they were traveling on was blown in half as it crossed the Luzane bridge; an ambulance rushing to the scene of the atrocity was struck by a second NATO attack. Eleven more innocent civilians died when four missiles blasted a bridge in Varvarin. Here, too, rescuers were hit by a second NATO strike.

Two separate accidental attacks on the very Albanians NATO was claiming to help killed more than a hundred refugees, many of them women and children. No one was safe from NATO’s fury. Civilian houses and apartment blocks were frequently destroyed. In tiny Surdulica, 16 people died when two missiles slammed into a residential neighborhood. Eleven of the dead were children. A month later the unlucky town reeled again after 20 helpless old men and women were blown to pieces when NATO bombs hit a sanatorium and old people’s home. The Chinese embassy in Belgrade was bombed due to outdated American maps, sparking large demonstrations in China. An errant missile even struck a house 30 miles from the Yugoslav border in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

The air war against Yugoslavia was the very first time that NATO had ever attacked a sovereign state. It did so unilaterally, absent any threat to any member nation, and without the approval of the UN Security Council. “If NATO can go for military action without international blessing, [it is] less than helpful in understanding the reliability of NATO as a security partner,” Sergey Kislyak, Russia’s ambassador to the United States and the former Russian permanent representative to NATO told Moral Low Ground at a reception in San Francisco last year. But apparently Bill Clinton was unconcerned about the legacy of bitterness and distrust that this unprecedented war would leave in its rubble.

As the people of Yugoslavia were being terrorized by NATO’s air war, the terrorists of the Kosovo Liberation Army stepped up their atrocities against Serbs and Gypsies in Kosovo. Shockingly, the NATO troops deployed there to keep the peace often failed to intervene to protect these ethnic minorities from the KLA’s brutal campaign of beating, kidnapping and murder. More than 164,000 Serbs were driven from the Albanian-dominated province. By the summer of 2001 KLA ethnic cleansing had rendered Kosovo almost entirely Albanian with just a few die-hard Serb holdouts living in fear and surrounded by barbed wire.

The KLA soon expanded its war into neighboring Macedonia. NATO Secretary-General Lord Robertson called the KLA “murderous thugs” but the United States, now with George W. Bush in charge, continued to provide invaluable support to the terrorists. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice personally intervened to force Ukraine to halt arms sales to the Macedonian army, the KLA’s new nemesis. And when a group of 400 KLA fighters found themselves surrounded at Aracinovo in June 2001, NATO ordered Macedonian forces to hold off their attack while a convoy of US Army buses rescued the besieged terrorists. It was later revealed that 17 American military advisers were embedded with the KLA fighters at Aracinovo. Remember that the KLA counted among its backers Osama bin Laden and other sworn enemies of the United States. Did the United States really hate Yugoslavia and Macedonia so much that it would back the terrorist KLA in its fight against two countries that had committed absolutely no hostile acts towards either the US or its NATO allies?

Of course not.

Killing for credibility. (Photo: Bob McNeely)

The bombing of Yugoslavia was really all about preserving the credibility of the United States and NATO. Washington’s saber-rattling towards Belgrade had painted the alliance into a corner from which the only way out was with guns blazing. Failure to follow through threats with action, said President Clinton, “would discredit NATO.”

“Our mission is clear,” the President declared, “to demonstrate the seriousness of NATO’s purpose.” Never mind that the purpose of NATO is to defend member states from outside attack. British Prime Minister Tony Blair concurred with Clinton: “To walk away now would… destroy NATO’s credibility.” Gary Dempsey, a foreign policy analyst at the libertarian Cato Institute, wrote that the Clinton administration “transformed a conflict that posed no threat to the territorial integrity, national sovereignty or general welfare of the United States into a major test of American resolve.

Going to war or prolonging a conflict for credibility’s sake is always a dangerous proposition that has repeatedly yielded disastrous results. Tens of thousands of US troops and many times that number of Vietnamese, Laotian and Cambodian civilians died while Richard Nixon sought an “honorable” way out of the Vietnam War. Ronald Reagan’s dogged defense of American credibility cost the lives of 299 American and French servicemen killed in the 1983 Hezbollah truck bombing of the multinational occupation force in Lebanon.

This time ensuring American credibility meant supporting the vicious Kosovo Liberation Army, some of whose soldiers had trained at Osama bin Laden’s terror camps in Afghanistan. This, despite the fact that bin Laden’s al Qaeda was responsible for multiple deadly attacks against the United States, including the 1998 embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania and the bombing of the USS Cole in October 2000.

Less than one year later, the proverbial chickens came home to roost in the tragic 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, DC. But rather than take a long, hard look at the historical record of American support for terrorism, US leaders blamed the attacks on the terrorists’ “hatred of our freedoms.” Meanwhile, the people of Serbia were literally  picking up the pieces of their country, which had also been a victim of a terrorist attack—a US-led NATO terror attack that began on March 24, 1999.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts


  1. Gianmarco Conegliano via FacebookMarch 24, 2011 at 12:32 pmReply

    I heard we used 1000 tons of depleted uranium in Yugoslavia. Now it’s all contaminated.

  2. Moral Low Ground via FacebookMarch 24, 2011 at 2:07 pmReply

    … just like in Iraq in ’91 and again in ’03-’04

  3. Gianmarco Conegliano via FacebookMarch 25, 2011 at 6:19 pmReply

    This was all done in our no-longer-good name…

  4. CroatApril 12, 2011 at 12:56 pmReply

    I think that NATO bombing Serbia is not comparable to Iraq and so on…
    You should google or youtube: Vukovar – Ovchara, Srebenica, Shkabranja, snipers in Sarajevo Serbina bombing of Dubrovnik (UNICEF protected old town), Slobodan Milošević, Ratko Mladić, Karađić and so on…and that happened before NATO bombing of innocent Serbia. Oh, yeah google this: the project of Great Serbia.

    NATO bombing Serbia is delayed action because international powers (America) and their bureaucracy(EU and “Great” Britain)failed before and allowed massacres of civilians in ex-Yugoslav states (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo)to happen. They failed in Bosnia and now in Bosnia we have state entity of Republic Srpska that is created on a genocide on the Muslim Bosniak people and Croats that lived in Bosnia.
    The constitution of Yugoslavia (1974) formed Yugoslav states whitin Yugoslavia, so don´t call that war civil there was nothing civil in it.

    And I AM NOT subjective here and I don´t blame nations just leaders and their followers.

    • Brett WilkinsApril 12, 2011 at 1:30 pmReplyAuthor

      Serbia was far from innocent. If my post gave the impression that it was, I apologize. Croats, Bosnians (of all varieties), Kosovars, Albanians, Macedonians, even Slovenians all suffered from the violence that followed the disintegration of Yugoslavia, once the jewel of the socialist world. And the excesses and aspirations of Serbian nationalists belong right up there with the crimes of the Nazis. However, for the sake of my post, I am concerning myself with NATO’s (read Washington’s) unjust military action against Serbia, which resulted in immense suffering for millions of innocent Serbs.

  5. CroatApril 12, 2011 at 1:03 pmReply

    Kosovo is just EUs and NATOs condoles in their mind for failed actions in “soon to be breaking” Bosnia. They should give Kosovo back to Serbia and occupied Bosnian territory to Bosnia.

  6. AlboJuly 14, 2011 at 1:44 amReply

    LOL at this article , serbs have been killing and oppresing anyone who is not a serb orthodox follower, including catholics not just muslims and read up on albanian muslims they love america so go spread your bs , not one muslim state voted to help kosovo part from serbia because they hate us for fighting terrorists with america , go read before you write such a false article

  7. TruthJuly 16, 2011 at 11:46 pmReply

    @croat lol you dont actually believe anything your saying, right?? the fact that all you do is mention a few names and cities and say look at what those bad serbs did goes to show how perverted serbia’s image is in the media that you dont even need to make a point unlike the article which gave you links to refrence every point and Wilkins did that specifically for ignorant people like yourself…now serbia’s biggest mistake was losing the media war, but of course that was inevitable since both Tudjman and Izetbegovic were clients of a powerful Public Relations firm Ruder Finn, which made sure that Serbia’s image in Washington and across the world was that of the aggressor and that the croatians and muslims were the victims. ok lets break down some of the things you said, lets start with Milosevic you seem to blame him for something but what?? the completely immoral and illegal Hague tribunal couldnt convict Milosevic on the things they charged him with and if you didnt follow the trial or read the transcripts like i did here is a link to a short doco made by VPRO Backlight , lets look at what was the turning point of the war, srebrenica. and lets use some common sense and leave feelings at the door, as the Romans used to say “cui bono” who benifits. Izetbegovic masterminded the fall of srebrenica along his nato allies to finally make the international community take action agaisnt serbs which he wanted all along, Naser Oric who destroyed 50 serbian villages surounding srebrenica making sure that once the let srebrenica fall the serbs revenge would do the rest, link- , but srebrenica wasnt the biggest tragedy that happened in croatia where 200 000 serbs where ethnically cleansed and thousands killed during operation storm and flash, ofcourse using US military aids, weapons and names. The reason the war started in croatia and bosnia are the illegal declaration of independence, but croatia and bosnia are little different where croations are the majority, the bosnian muslims are a minority when serb christians and croation christians are counted together in bosnia, the reason serbs didnt want to live under a croatian gov. is simple and i quote ” The greatest genocide during World War II, in proportion to nation’s population, took place, not in Nazi Germany but in Nazi-created puppet state of Croatia. There, in the years 1941-1945, some 750,000 Serbs, 60,000 Jews and 26,000 Gypsies — men, women and children — perished in a gigantic holocaust. These are the figures used by most foreign authors, especially Germans, who were in the best position to know… Edmond Paris. in bosnia however the mojority was christian and Izetbegovic had no right to create an islamic state which is what he wanted and stated in his book “The Islamic Declaration”1969. i could write for days how the serbs were more of the victims and mojority of the times reacted to crimes that were commited on them first, but all im gonna say like every serb would and by that you know who is right “it was a disgusting war and all sides commited crimes” Having said all that the blame for the break up of yugoslavia lies in US foreign policies such as National Security Decision Directive 133 “US policy will be to promote the trend toward an effective, market-oriented yugoslav economic structure” which of course was puched through by the same international bankers who are still lending money which the former states of yugoslavia will never repay and everything that was nationalized will be in private hands….as the old saying goes DEVIDE AND CONQUER.

    @Albo – your stupidity amazes me, the muslims that didnt help you were real islamic states like indonesia, but that goes to show what kind of people you are that you would wave an american flag while they are senselessly killing innocent people in the middle east

  8. US-NATO Bombed Civilians… And The Wrong Side | Serbia's Ambassador to the WorldSeptember 30, 2011 at 7:35 pmReply

    […] social justice advocate based in San Francisco, California, has such an amazingly good essay on how US-NATO bombed the wrong side, and was targeting the people of Serbia as much– if not more– than the military. I’m having trouble deciding which parts to […]

  9. Daniel SkippJuly 13, 2012 at 5:51 pmReply

    Great article on the US creating the Mujihadeen and the war on Serbia [interested parties should google Muslim Brotherhood and London and the BND, MI6 and CIA]… but then you go all naive about the motives and prove that you have no clue by pinning on all those bombings in the US on AlQaeda!! ROFMLAO!

    Actually behind the US, Croatia, Germany etc etc stands ROME, in the process of Syncretising a New Age Religion for Global Slavery. And behind them lie darker forces still. You article sticks to the wrong side of the fence.

  10. VancoDecember 5, 2013 at 2:06 amReply

    And where was Russia that whole time? I tought Serbia and Russia were allies. I remember those times, I went to Macedonia to visit my family that summer, the freeways, streets and airport were full of US and Nato equipment. The Albanians were allowed to kill us Christians and nato telling us not to shoot back??? This wasnt war against Albania, these were terrorists. And why was America helping terrorists? Serbia had every right to protect Kosovo. What would America do if all the sudden the southern states like texas or confederate south would raise up for independence? After the muslims took over Kosovo, all the churches were destroyed. Some of them have been there for thousands of years. I hope god punishes Clinton and all those responsible for this.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Douche Du Jour
  • GOP Congressman Robert Pittenger Says Charlotte Protesters ‘Hate White People Because They’re Successful’
  • Israel Nominates Col. Eyal Karim, Who Endorsed Rape of Non-Jews to ‘Boost Troop Morale,’ for Chief Military Rabbi
  • The Hateful 8: Anti-Gay Christian Leaders Praise Orlando Massacre
  • Koch Brother’s Youth Education Program Teaches ‘Sacrificing Lives for Profits’
  • Tracy Murphree, GOP Texas Sheriff Candidate, Threatens to Beat Transgender Women Unconscious